Feedback: Bike tax a good idea

Like most cyclists, I am also a driver (of a V-8 SUV no less), and I do enjoy an occasional drink, so I already pay my share of liquor and gas taxes.

I would have replied to the letter by L.K. Lohse (News-Times, April 27) sooner, but as it happens I was out of town riding my bike that week. Such thoughtless sputtering is too good to go undisputed, yet buried deep inside the lump of useless whining is a gem.

Like most cyclists, I am also a driver (of a V-8 SUV no less), and I do enjoy an occasional drink, so I already pay my share of liquor and gas taxes. Death though has always been low priority on my to-do list so I’ve wiggled out of the tobacco tax along with the other non-smokers who make up 80 percent of the Washington population.

Yet, I agree with the idea for a bike tax. Those funds, however, should go to projects that positively impact cyclists by implementing useful bike lanes on busy streets — unlike the lanes on Heller Road, near Hillcrest Elementary, which runs about one-tenth of a mile (less than a block) before leaving riders in the gutter. This wasted paint and four road signs are of no practical use to anybody on a bike. It certainly doesn’t help in providing any margin of safety to school kids riding their bikes to school or visiting the playground in the summertime.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

There are other local roads like Fort Nugent Road which already have wide, paved shoulders which could easily support a useful bike lane along its entire length. All they need are markings.

Chances are that most close calls between cars and bikes are a result of drivers not paying attention. Odds do not favor the cyclist in a collision, so the majority of cyclists respect the drivers riding past them (apparently death is low on their to-do list too). Unfortunately the opposite isn’t always true.

Jon Rasmussen

Oak Harbor